Changes in Japan's Foreign Policy: US Military Presence

Changes in Japan's Foreign Policy: US Military Presence



Curtis refers to the number of American bases in Okinawa and asks Tanaka whether the US and Japan need such a significant military presence in Okinawa and Japan. Is it a matter of Pentagon convenience? Tanaka mentions that tensions with North Korea are sharper and expresses concerns about Chinese military expenditures, but believes it is premature to talk about the need of military presence based on current tensions in East Asia. However, reduction of base facilities must be constantly dealt with. Tanaka points out the US’s tendency to assume the continuation of policies convenient to them regardless of the change in Japan’s government. He urges the US to look beyond the insistence of Japan’s fulfillment of the agreement and once again stresses the importance of viewing the alliance in a broader context.

Questions for Students:
What are the arguments that support the 2006 agreement to relocate the Futenma base to Henoko? What are the elements being considered in choosing a relocation site?

Related Debate Videos:
Changes in Japan's Foreign Policy: 3 Elements in US-Japan Relations
Changes in Japan's Foreign Policy: A Broader Concept
Changes in Japan's Foreign Policy: America's Views on Hatoyama
Changes in Japan's Foreign Policy: Futenma
Changes in Japan's Foreign Policy: Multi-Layered Functional Architecture

 

Type,Article; Type,Article; Theme,Globalization; Theme,Social Issues;
Okinawa, Futenma, bases, US-Japan Security Alliance, DPJ, international security,government, policy